Are you manic about misplaced commas? Apoplectic over rogue apostrophes? Distressed by the disappearing question mark?

You don’t have to be an outspoken member of the punctuation police to know the significance those swirls, curls, dots and dashes play in every reader and writer’s life. But in this digital-infused age, many of those markers have been turned on their little charcoal heads.

Question mark made from daisy flowers

As we observe National Punctuation Day on Saturday, it might be helpful to look back at the genesis of the punctuation playbook – and help us navigate a new word order of breathless texts and tweets, one in which markers are MIA or carry a different meaning.

Ancient text in many cultures featured logograms that represented a word or a phrase. There was no need for spacing and punctuation because the meaning of the symbol was self-contained. When early alphabetic writing took root, there was no upper or lower case, no pauses. Just an endless train of text that could be difficult to digest.

Enter Aristophanes of Byzantium, a Greek literary critic, grammarian and chief librarian in Alexandria, Egypt, around 200 BC. Many historians say he created the first forms of punctuation: single dots to help readers take a break.

For a short passage a dot was placed at midlevel in the script; for a longer passage a dot was placed at the bottom; for a very long passage the dot was placed near the top.

These little dots, which would one day become the comma, colon and period, were introduced as a way to help comprehension when text was read out loud – not the written word.

As Christianity spread across Europe a few centuries later, comprehension of text took on added importance. Word of mouth was no longer sufficient to pass along religious teachings and traditions. Christian writers in the 6th and 7th centuries saw the need for using symbols in text to preserve the meaning of their words.

The invention of movable type marked another milestone for punctuation. In 1476, William Caxton, a merchant, diplomat and writer, became the first English retailer of printed books. He took punctuation to a new level by introducing three marks: the stroke or slash  for marking word groups, the colon for marking specific pauses and the period for marking ends of sentences and short “stops.”

In the late 1400s, Venetian printer Aldus Manutius and his grandson, Aldo Manutius the Younger, introduced a standardised system of punctuation by ending a sentence with the colon or a “full stop.” The duo also are credited with creating the look of the modern comma, using parentheses and inventing the semicolon.

And perhaps most key, the younger Manutius published a book in 1566 explaining the use of the comma, colon and period as well as other punctuation – and stating that the marks were needed to ensure accuracy of text.

Fast forward 500 or so years.

In many ways, the invention of the printing press froze punctuation in time. The symbols on our keyboards today are more or less the same as they were centuries earlier. But what has changed is the way punctuation is used (or not used) and the message it delivers on our devices.



Next Article >
As I scroll through Instagram, my mind tends to slip into a fugue state, the kind that should be expected from beaming a pure and endless stream of delicious-looking food, friends, puppies, celebrities, nature, Confucius quotes, and sunsets into my eyes. I temporarily forget where I am, whether that’s on a street corner or my own couch, and just keep swiping up on my phone’s screen, soaking in images like UV rays in a high-powered tanning bed turned up to “Snookie.” Then there comes an inevitable point in my Insta-hole when I thumb over a bag I want to buy, or a story I want to read. As I skim the image caption, I am abruptly awakened by the words: “Link in bio.” Link. In. Bio: A phrase that launched a thousand 20-somethings’ social media jobs. Kylie Jenner says it. Chance the Rapper rhymed it with pico de gallo once. The New York Times uses a grammatically correct version of it. Ditto the White House. Even Ringer social media manager Rubie Edmondson has been forced to use the phrase on occasion. (She readily admits that she “dies a little inside” every time she writes it.) However grating, those three words have become a necessity for anyone hoping to reap the benefits of Instagram’s growing audience. The six-year-old social media network hosts about 500 million active users a month, including Beyoncé, the Transportation Security Administration, and Chechnyan leader Ramzan Kadyrov (he’s a ruthless dictator who has a thing for cats!). Entire cottage industries rely on its audience and yes, those precious bio links, to make money. And yet, Instagram prevents its users from including links everywhere on the site except the “website” section of a person’s profile. Take a moment to think about that. A network that hosts millions of people won’t let them do something that is second nature for digital natives. So its users have concocted their own clunky loophole to get around the problem. It’s as if there were a permanent snowstorm in a city, and the mayor refused to clear the sidewalks. Inevitably, pedestrians would just stomp out their own inelegant roundabout paths to navigate the dirty, urine-filled slush. And just like those slush paths, the “link in bio” loophole is semi-functional, at best. Instagram’s photo feed is no longer chronological. So when a news post says “story link in bio,” that very well could not even be true anymore! It could be a different link, or no there could be no link at all. When I start chasing down a Shade Room link, it rarely leads me to the story I was looking for, because the account posts something like 20 images a day and even I’m not addicted enough to Instagram to catch them all as they post. The same goes for the recipes Bon Appetit teases in its scrumptious food photo captions: I often land on instructions to make a Greek salad when I was really interested in wings. I can only imagine how many thousands of dollars of debt I would be in if I could “click to buy” the items featured on clothing labels’ Instagrams, rather than search for a bio link that leads me to the homepage of a website.